C. Theory of Initiation of
MA
From a theoretical point of view, it seems
necessary that the visual system be able to
distinguish between blur that is caused by
spherical ametropia and blur that is due to
astigmatic ametropia. If PSA and PMA both
responded to any given blur stimulus, both types
of accommodation would be stimulated without
necessity. This is simply not practical as it
would pose a greater delay in focusing.
A much more effective focusing would be
achieved if the visual cortex and related
structures of the brain had the ability to detect
meridional blur. An MA response could then be
initiated in the direction required, so as to
overcome any WTR corneal astigmatism which may be
causing the meridional blur.
Evidence in support of the existence of a
mechanism to detect meridional blur can be found
in the study of contrast sensitivity, in cases of
nystagmus. Loshin and Browning (1982) point out
that these cases are associated with a loss of
contrast sensitivity in the horizontal meridian,
which is attributed to the horizontal nystagmoid
eye movements. They found that a similar loss of
contrast sensitivity was found in cases of
albinism which they attributed to the associated
nystagmus.
Of relevance is the study of Nathan et al (1985),
who looked at data of 256 children attending a
low vision clinic. They found distinctly higher
levels of astigmatism in those children with
albinism, retinitis pigmentosa and idiopathic
nystagmus. They stated that the differences in
the amount of astigmatism between the 14 disease
groups did not seem to be associated with depth
of visual loss.
My belief is that detection of meridional blur
is the essential factor in eliciting a purposeful
PMA response to counteract corneal astigmatism.
If, as in cases of idiopathic nystagmus, or
secondary nystagmus in albinism, this sensitivity
to blur is diminished, so will the ability of the
visual system to elicit a PMA response. The
findings that RP children also had significant
levels of astigmatism, and that depth of visual
loss did not seem to be a crucial factor, suggest
that information from the whole retina is used in
assessing the meridional blur stimulus for PMA.
The means by which meridional blur detection
is carried out is somewhat speculative. It would
seem that basic information about orientation,
edge detection and contrast sensitivity, would be
essential in order to achieve this. This
information is available in simple cortical cells,
and it could be further processed to enable
detection of the orientation of ever-small
increments of meridional blur. This higher level
of information could be passed on to a specific
subnucleus, which would be closely related to the
sub-nucleus for PSA, via such intermediary nuclei
as the pulvinar and superior colliculus.
Innervation from the IIIrd nerve nucleus to the
temporal ciliary muscle could be relayed via the
ciliary ganglion as for PSA. The temporal long
ciliary nerve is best positioned anatomically to
innervate the PMA muscle fibres. SMA could be
relayed through the cervical ganglion and the
long ciliary nerve. (Morgan 1944).
It is worth noting the experiments performed
on chicks by Irving et al (1995). These
experiments demonstrate the remarkable ability of
the chick's visual system to adapt to induced
astigmatic ametropia by appropriate meridional
changes in power, primarily of the lens and to a
slightly lesser extent, the cornea. Whilst the 9D
cylindrical lenses which were applied did not
induce the exact power change in the eyes, the
axis was always accurate.
Part II: CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS OF MERIDIONAL
ACCOMMODATION was available at the 11th APOC
conference as a handout accompanying the
Proceedings Manual.
I wish to thank Dr. B Pierscionek for her advice and comments.
I also wish to thank Lorraine Lipson for her library assistance
in the Victorian College of Optometry, Melbourne Australia.
Next
|